Notice: Function wpdb::prepare was called incorrectly. The query argument of wpdb::prepare() must have a placeholder. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.9.0.) in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Notice: Function wpdb::prepare was called incorrectly. The query argument of wpdb::prepare() must have a placeholder. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.9.0.) in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-content/themes/fluidify-child/single.php on line 36
Notice: Function wpdb::prepare was called incorrectly. The query argument of wpdb::prepare() must have a placeholder. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.9.0.) in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-content/themes/fluidify-child/single.php on line 98

Artikel
09
January
Google: Author Bylines Not A Ranking Factor
In a recent clarification on social media, Google’s Search Liaison addressed a widespread misconception regarding the influence of author bylines on search rankings.
Misconception In The SEO Community
The issue arose after a notable publication suggested that including author bylines could boost content’s visibility in Google’s search results.
According to the publication, this claim has prompted many websites to adjust their content strategies under the assumption that bylines would boost their ranking.
Google’s Clarification On Bylines
Google’s Search Liaison took to X (formerly Twitter) to address the misinformation.
In a response, the liaison stated:
“I know this will be a ‘simple, almost quaint answer’ but this part of the article is wrong nor cites us saying this. Google doesn’t somehow ‘check out our credentials.’”
He emphasized that Google doesn’t use bylines as a direct ranking signal and that the publication’s claim was incorrect.
Bylines, the liaison explained, aren’t a tool for improving search rankings but rather for the benefit of the readers.
He added:
“Author bylines aren’t something you do for Google, and they don’t help you rank better. They’re something you do for your readers — and publications doing them may exhibit the type of other characteristics our ranking systems find align with useful content.”
Read: What is Google E-E-A-T? How To Demonstrate First-Hand Experience
Further Clarification Regarding Author Bylines
Google’s Search Liaison continued:
“Just adding a byline doesn’t give a ranking boost. Nor do we somehow read information in or near a byline and think ‘Oh, they say they’re an expert, so this must be written by an expert.’”
He noted that while having accurate bylines and information might correlate with quality content, they aren’t direct ranking factors.
He adds that plenty of content without bylines ranks well, reinforcing that they’re not required to succeed in search rankings.
See also: Google Highlights Forums & Profiles With New Structured Data
Key Takeaways For SEO Professionals
For SEO professionals, the key points to remember are:
- Google doesn’t use author bylines as a factor in search rankings.
- Bylines should be included for reader benefit and might coincide with other quality signals.
- Quality content can rank well with or without an author byline.
- Google plans to update its documentation to help clarify ranking factors and improve communication with SEO professionals.
This clarification from Google’s Search Liaison serves as another reminder to create high-quality content that serves your audience rather than strategies that have no direct impact on search rankings.
Featured Image: Vectorium/Shutterstock
What's your reaction ?
Follow us on Social Media
Some Categories
Warning: Attempt to read property "ID" on string in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-content/themes/fluidify-child/single.php on line 365
Warning: Attempt to read property "name" on string in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-content/themes/fluidify-child/single.php on line 365
Content
Recent posts
Deprecated: number_format(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($num) of type float is deprecated in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-content/themes/fluidify-child/single.php on line 407
Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-content/themes/fluidify-child/single.php on line 412

June 24, 2025
Nulurencontract verdwijnt: nieuwe regels moeten leiden tot meer vaste contracten
Deprecated: number_format(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($num) of type float is deprecated in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-content/themes/fluidify-child/single.php on line 407
Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-content/themes/fluidify-child/single.php on line 412

June 18, 2025
Loonstijgingen cao's vlakken in april 2025 af na 2,5 jaar van sterke groei
Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-content/themes/fluidify-child/single.php on line 412

June 17, 2025
Goede prompts voor ChatGPT bestaan uit deze 6 ingrediënten
Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-content/themes/fluidify-child/single.php on line 412

June 17, 2025
Opdrachtgevers twijfelen aan je zelfstandigheid? Dit certificaat lost het op
Deprecated: number_format(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($num) of type float is deprecated in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-content/themes/fluidify-child/single.php on line 407
Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /var/www/app.livelearn.nl/public_html/app/wp-content/themes/fluidify-child/single.php on line 412

June 05, 2025
Arbeidsmarkt blijft krap, lonen stijgen, participatie is hoog
Comments (0)
No reviews found
Add Comment